From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hoffman v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION
Aug 1, 2012
Case No. 3:11-cv-42 (D.N.D. Aug. 1, 2012)

Opinion

Case No. 3:11-cv-42

08-01-2012

Jay M. Hoffman, Plaintiff, v. Social Security Administration Commissioner, Michael J. Astrue Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING

REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

The Court has received a Report and Recommendation from the Honorable Karen K. Klein, United States Magistrate Judge, recommending that both parties' motions for summary judgment be denied (Docs. #13 and 17), but that the plaintiff's motion for remand be granted (Doc. #22). Neither party has objected to the Report and Recommendation.

The Court has reviewed the Report and Recommendation, along with the entire record in this matter, and finds that the Magistrate Judge's position is correct. The Court adopts the Report and Recommendation in its entirety and ORDERS that both parties' motions for summary judgment are DENIED. It is FURTHER ORDERED that Jay M. Hoffman's motion for remand is GRANTED. This matter shall be remanded for further proceedings in accordance with this Order and the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

_______________

Ralph R. Erickson, District Judge

United States District Court


Summaries of

Hoffman v. Astrue

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION
Aug 1, 2012
Case No. 3:11-cv-42 (D.N.D. Aug. 1, 2012)
Case details for

Hoffman v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:Jay M. Hoffman, Plaintiff, v. Social Security Administration Commissioner…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NORTH DAKOTA SOUTHEASTERN DIVISION

Date published: Aug 1, 2012

Citations

Case No. 3:11-cv-42 (D.N.D. Aug. 1, 2012)