From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hofer v. Grundy

Court of Appeal of California, Second District
Jun 3, 1914
24 Cal.App. 686 (Cal. Ct. App. 1914)

Opinion

Civ. No. 1563.

June 3, 1914.

MOTION to dismiss an appeal from the Superior Court of Los Angeles County.

The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

H. M. Barstow, and Howard E. Reach, for Appellants.

Charles W. Fourl, for Respondent.


Respondent moves to dismiss defendants' appeal from the judgment herein upon the ground that appellants have wholly failed to serve and file a transcript within the time prescribed by rule II. The record shows that by stipulation a substituted bond on appeal was filed on March 19, 1914. Respondent's notice of motion to dismiss the appeal was served and filed on March 21st, and was presented and submitted to the court on April 28th. Manifestly the motion was prematurely made and should be denied. It is so ordered.

James, J., and Shaw, J., concurred.


Summaries of

Hofer v. Grundy

Court of Appeal of California, Second District
Jun 3, 1914
24 Cal.App. 686 (Cal. Ct. App. 1914)
Case details for

Hofer v. Grundy

Case Details

Full title:FRED A. HOFER, Respondent, v. C. FRED GRUNDY et al., Appellants

Court:Court of Appeal of California, Second District

Date published: Jun 3, 1914

Citations

24 Cal.App. 686 (Cal. Ct. App. 1914)
142 P. 102