From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

HOEY v. RENDELL

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 23, 2009
2:08cv618 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 23, 2009)

Opinion

2:08cv618.

March 23, 2009


MEMORANDUM ORDER


The above captioned case was initiated by the filing of a Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (doc. no. 1) on May 7, 2008, and was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan for pretrial proceedings in accordance with the Magistrate Judges Act, 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1), and Rules 72.1.3 and 72.1.4 of the Local Rules for Magistrate Judges.

Magistrate Judge Lisa Pupo Lenihan filed a Report and Recommendation on February 17, 2009, (doc. no. 21), recommending that the Plaintiff's Complaint be dismissed in accordance with the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and/or 28 U.S.C. § 1915A for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Report further recommended that Plaintiff's Motion for Declaratory Judgment (doc. no. 8) be denied. Plaintiff was served with the Report and Recommendation and advised that he had until March 6, 2009, to file objections to the Report and Recommendation. No objections have been filed.

After de novo review of the pleadings and documents in the case, together with the Report and Recommendation, the following order is entered: AND NOW, this 23th day of March, 2009;

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Complaint is DISMISSED in accordance with the Prison Litigation Reform Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2)(B)(ii) and/or 28 U.S.C. § 1915A for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion for Declaratory Judgment (doc. no. 8) is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Report and Recommendation (doc. no. 21) of Magistrate Judge Lenihan dated February 17, 2009, is adopted as the Opinion of the Court.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court mark this case CLOSED. AND IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that pursuant to Rule 4(a)(1) of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, Plaintiff has thirty (30) days to file a notice of appeal as provided by Rule 3 of the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure.


Summaries of

HOEY v. RENDELL

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Mar 23, 2009
2:08cv618 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 23, 2009)
Case details for

HOEY v. RENDELL

Case Details

Full title:CASEY LEE HOEY Plaintiff, v. EDWARD G. RENDELL, THOMAS CORBETT JR.…

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania

Date published: Mar 23, 2009

Citations

2:08cv618 (W.D. Pa. Mar. 23, 2009)