Hoes v. Hume

Full title: William M. Hoes, as Public Administrator, etc., as Administrator, etc., of…

Court: Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 1, 1896

5 App. Div. 620 (N.Y. App. Div. 1896)

Opinion

May Term, 1896.

Present — Van Brunt, P.J., Barrett, Rumsey, O'Brien and Ingraham, JJ.

Judgment affirmed, with costs. —

PER CURIAM:

The rule laid down upon the previous appeal ( Stebbins v. Hume, 16 N.Y. St. Repr. 128) is the law of this case, so far as this court is concerned. The trial judge ruled precisely in accordance with the views there expressed by the General Term. We should, therefore, affirm his ruling. The judgment should be affirmed, with costs.