From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hoen v. Kidd

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Jun 28, 1917
101 A. 782 (Md. 1917)

Opinion

Decided June 28th, 1917.

Conflicts in testimony: question for jury. Real estate broker's commissions.

Where there is a conflict in properly admitted testimony, it is error to withdraw the case from the consideration of the jury.

Decided June 28th, 1917.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Baltimore County. (DUNCAN, J.)

The cause was argued before BOYD, C.J., BURKE, THOMAS, PATTISON, URNER and STOCKBRIDGE, JJ.

Elmer J. Cook, for the appellant.

T. Scott Offutt, for the appellee.


This was a suit brought by the appellee against the appellant for the recovery of commissions claimed to have been earned by the plaintiff (the appellee), under a contract, in effecting a sale of woodland belonging to the defendant which he had been employed to sell. A prayer of the defendant to withdraw the case from the consideration of the jury was refused, and the verdict being for the plaintiff, the defendant took this appeal.


Summaries of

Hoen v. Kidd

Court of Appeals of Maryland
Jun 28, 1917
101 A. 782 (Md. 1917)
Case details for

Hoen v. Kidd

Case Details

Full title:FRANK N. HOEN vs . FRANK B. KIDD

Court:Court of Appeals of Maryland

Date published: Jun 28, 1917

Citations

101 A. 782 (Md. 1917)
101 A. 782

Citing Cases

Hill v. Iglehart

The legal principles controlling the first proposition have been frequently announced by this Court, and from…

Atlas Realty Co. v. Galt

In our opinion, therefore, the prayer under consideration was properly refused. Hoen v. Kidd, 130 Md. 696. By…