From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hoelscher v. Brazleton

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Jun 12, 2015
CV 13-1010-PSG (JPR) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 12, 2015)

Opinion

          Loren James Hoelscher, Petitioner, Pro se, San Diego, CA.

          For P D Brazleton, Warden, Respondent: Shira Seigle Markovich, CAAG - Office of the Attorney General, California Department of Justice, Los Angeles, CA.


          ORDER ACCEPTING FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE

          PHILIP S. GUTIERREZ, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE.

         The Court has reviewed the Petition, records on file, and Report and Recommendation of U.S. Magistrate Judge. On May 22, 2015, Petitioner filed objections to the R& R, in which he mostly simply repeats the arguments in the Petition and Traverse. None of Petitioner's objections undermine the Magistrate Judge's reasoning in the R& R.

         Having made a de novo determination of those portions of the R& R to which Petitioner has filed objections, the Court accepts the findings and recommendations of the Magistrate Judge.

         IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that judgment be entered denying the Petition and dismissing this action with prejudice.

         JUDGMENT

         Pursuant to the Order Accepting Findings and Recommendations of U.S. Magistrate Judge, IT IS HEREBY ADJUDGED that this action is dismissed with prejudice.


Summaries of

Hoelscher v. Brazleton

United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California
Jun 12, 2015
CV 13-1010-PSG (JPR) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 12, 2015)
Case details for

Hoelscher v. Brazleton

Case Details

Full title:LOREN JAMES HOELSCHER, Petitioner, v. P.D. BRAZLETON, Warden, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, Ninth Circuit, California, C.D. California

Date published: Jun 12, 2015

Citations

CV 13-1010-PSG (JPR) (C.D. Cal. Jun. 12, 2015)