Hoekstra v. Credit One Bank

Full title: Jelmer Hoekstra, Plaintiff(s), v. Credit One Bank, N. A.; Capital One…

Court: United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Jan 19, 2022

2:21-cv-02082-GMN-VCF (D. Nev. Jan. 19, 2022)

Opinion

2:21-cv-02082-GMN-VCF

01-19-2022

Jelmer Hoekstra, Plaintiff(s), v. Credit One Bank, N. A.; Capital One Services, LLC; and American Express National Bank, Defendant(s).

George Haines, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 9411 Gerardo Avalos, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 15171 FREEDOM LAW FIRM Attorneys for Plaintiff Jelmer Hoekstra Mcdonald Carano LLP Jeff Silvestri, Esq. Julia L. Armendariz, Esq. Counsel for Capital One Services, LLC

GLORIA M. NAVARRO, DISTRICT JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

George Haines, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 9411 Gerardo Avalos, Esq. Nevada Bar No. 15171

FREEDOM LAW FIRM

Attorneys for Plaintiff Jelmer Hoekstra

Mcdonald Carano LLP

Jeff Silvestri, Esq.

Julia L. Armendariz, Esq.

Counsel for Capital One Services, LLC

STIPULATION OF DISMISSAL OF CAPITAL ONE BANK (USA), N.A., NAMED IN THE COMPLAINT AS "CAPITAL ONE SERVICES, LLC," WITH PREJUDICE

GLORIA M. NAVARRO, DISTRICT JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

Pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Jelmer Hoekstra (Plaintiff) and Capital One Bank (USA), N.A., named in the Complaint as "Capital One Services, LLC" (Defendant), stipulate to dismiss Plaintiff's claims against Defendant with prejudice.

Each party will bear its own costs, disbursements, and attorney fees.

IT IS SO ORDERED.