From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hoegh v. Credit Based Asset Servicing & Securitization, Llc.

Supreme Court of Florida.
Nov 18, 2014
160 So. 3d 895 (Fla. 2014)

Opinion

No. SC14–1578.

11-18-2014

Gloria J. HOEGH, et al., Petitioner(s), v. CREDIT BASED ASSET SERVICING AND SECURITIZATION, LLC., et al., Respondent(s).


Opinion

Because petitioners have failed to show a clear legal right to the relief requested, they are not entitled to mandamus relief. Accordingly, the petition for writ of mandamus is hereby denied. See Huffman v. State, 813 So.2d 10, 11 (Fla.2000).

PARIENTE, LEWIS, QUINCE, CANADY, and POLSTON, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hoegh v. Credit Based Asset Servicing & Securitization, Llc.

Supreme Court of Florida.
Nov 18, 2014
160 So. 3d 895 (Fla. 2014)
Case details for

Hoegh v. Credit Based Asset Servicing & Securitization, Llc.

Case Details

Full title:Gloria J. HOEGH, et al., Petitioner(s), v. CREDIT BASED ASSET SERVICING…

Court:Supreme Court of Florida.

Date published: Nov 18, 2014

Citations

160 So. 3d 895 (Fla. 2014)