From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

HOEFT v. RAIN HAIL, LLC

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Oct 31, 2001
Civil No. 01-581-AS (D. Or. Oct. 31, 2001)

Opinion

Civil No. 01-581-AS

October 31, 2001


O R D E R


On October 3, 2001, Magistrate Judge Ashmanskas issued a Findings and Recommendation (doc. 25) in this action, in which the Magistrate Judge recommended that defendants' motion to compel arbitration (doc. 3) be granted, and the action stayed pending arbitration. No objections were filed. The matter is now before me pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b).

When no timely objection is filed, the court need only satisfy itself that there is no clear error on the face of the record in order to accept the recommendation of the Magistrate. Campbell v. United States District Court, 501 F.2d 196 (9th Cir. 1974).

No clear error appears on the face of the record. This court adopts the Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation.

CONCLUSION

The Magistrate Judge's Findings and Recommendation (doc. # 25) is adopted. Defendants' motion to compel arbitration (doc. 3) is granted, and the action is stayed pending arbitration.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

HOEFT v. RAIN HAIL, LLC

United States District Court, D. Oregon
Oct 31, 2001
Civil No. 01-581-AS (D. Or. Oct. 31, 2001)
Case details for

HOEFT v. RAIN HAIL, LLC

Case Details

Full title:CLIFF HOEFT and SOUTH COUNTY HELICOPTER, LLC, Plaintiff, v. RAIN HAIL…

Court:United States District Court, D. Oregon

Date published: Oct 31, 2001

Citations

Civil No. 01-581-AS (D. Or. Oct. 31, 2001)

Citing Cases

JPaulJones, L.P. v. Zurich Gen. Ins. Co.

Molodyh is inapplicable because that opinion does not prohibit binding forum selection clauses in insurance…