From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hodgson v. Baltimore Regional Joint Board

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 16, 1972
462 F.2d 180 (4th Cir. 1972)

Opinion

No. 71-1728.

Argued May 30, 1972.

Decided June 16, 1972.

Bernard W. Rubenstein, Baltimore, Md. (Jacob J. Edelman, Bernard P. Jeweler, and Edelman, Levy, Rubenstein, Baltimore, Md. on brief), for appellant.

Carin Ann Clauss, Asst. Sol., U.S. Department of Labor (Richard F. Schubert, Solicitor of Labor, Donald S. Shire, Anastasia T. Dunau, Sylvia S. Ellison, Attys., Washington, D.C., and Louis Weiner, Regional Sol., on brief), for appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland.

Before SOBELOFF, Senior Circuit Judge, and WINTER and CRAVEN, Circuit Judges.


The Baltimore Regional Joint Board, Amalgamated Clothing Workers of America, AFL-CIO [Union] prosecutes this appeal from a judgment of the District Court imposing upon it joint and several liability with Sagner, Inc., a clothing manufacturer. The employer discriminated against certain women employees by paying them less than their male counterparts for equivalent work. Sagner finally admitted the discrimination and offered to make restitution. But at the instigation of the appellant Union and in violation of the Fair Labor Standards Act of 1938, 29 U.S.C. § 201 et seq., the major part of the arrearage due was diverted to increase the pay of another group of employees also represented by the Union.

For reasons sufficiently indicated by the District Court, Hodgson v. Sagner, Inc., 326 F. Supp. 371 (D.Md. 1971), we agree that the court was within its general equitable powers in imposing such liability upon the Union. The judgment is therefore

Affirmed.


Summaries of

Hodgson v. Baltimore Regional Joint Board

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit
Jun 16, 1972
462 F.2d 180 (4th Cir. 1972)
Case details for

Hodgson v. Baltimore Regional Joint Board

Case Details

Full title:JAMES D. HODGSON, SECRETARY OF LABOR, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF LABOR…

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Date published: Jun 16, 1972

Citations

462 F.2d 180 (4th Cir. 1972)

Citing Cases

Northwest Airlines, Inc. v. Transport Workers Union

This power certainly includes the authority to seek redress against unions which violate the Act.E. g.,…

Usery v. Board of Public Ed.

And certainly, the union cannot be contending it has the right to resist or oppose a court's compelling ATT…