Hodges v. Lamora

2 Citing cases

  1. Rodriguez v. Arkansas D.H.S

    200 S.W.3d 431 (Ark. 2005)   Cited 13 times

    Assignments of error unsupported by convincing argument or authority will not be considered on appeal, unless it is apparent without further research that the point is well taken. Hodges v. Lamora, 337 Ark. 470, 989 S.W.2d 530 (1999). Mary's second point on appeal is her claim that the court erred in admitting the report of Dr. DeYoub into evidence.

  2. Rainey v. Hartness

    339 Ark. 293 (Ark. 1999)   Cited 39 times
    Holding that "we do not consider assertions of error that are unsupported by convincing legal authority or argument, unless it is apparent without further research that the argument is well taken"

    This court has stated on numerous occasions that we do not consider assertions of error that are unsupported by convincing legal authority or argument, unless it is apparent without further research that the argument is well taken. See, e.g., National Bank of Commerce v. Dow Chem. Co., 338 Ark. 752, 1 S.W.3d 443 (1999); Ellis v. Price, 337 Ark. 542, 990 S.W.2d 543 (1999); Hodges v. Lamora, 337 Ark. 470, 989 S.W.2d 530 (1999). Accordingly, we summarily affirm on this issue.