From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hodges v. Jones

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 25, 1997
238 A.D.2d 962 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

April 25, 1997

Present — Pine, J.P., Lawton, Doerr, Boehm and Fallon, JJ.


Order unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Defendant met his burden of submitting evidence to demonstrate that plaintiff did not sustain a serious injury within the meaning of Insurance Law § 5102 (d). Contrary to plaintiff's contention, that burden may be satisfied by submitting plaintiff's deposition testimony and the medical records of plaintiff that were supplied by plaintiff's counsel ( see, Nigro v. Penree, 238 A.D.2d 908 [decided herewith]; Lowe v. Bennett, 122 A.D.2d 728, affd 69 N.Y.2d 700). Those submissions establish that plaintiff did not fracture her right knee or sustain a significant limitation of use of a body function or system. Although plaintiff's treating physician submitted an affidavit wherein he opined that plaintiff may have sustained a bone chip or cartilage tear in the right knee, additional X rays and an MRI performed six months after that affidavit was prepared revealed no fracture, tear or bone fragments. Moreover, the abnormalities found in plaintiff's knee as a result of the MRI were described as "mild". (Appeal from Order of Supreme Court, Erie County, Rath, Jr., J. — Summary Judgment.)


Summaries of

Hodges v. Jones

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
Apr 25, 1997
238 A.D.2d 962 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

Hodges v. Jones

Case Details

Full title:PEARLIE HODGES, Appellant, v. FRED D. JONES, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: Apr 25, 1997

Citations

238 A.D.2d 962 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
661 N.Y.S.2d 159

Citing Cases

Sang Soo Suh v. Golden

In support of the motion for summary judgment, the defendants submit, inter alia, the affirmed examination…

Troche v. New York City Transit Authority

The Supreme Court correctly determined that the defendants failed to make a prima facie showing that none of…