From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hodges v. Bryant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Jul 21, 2015
No. CIV-14-1192-C (W.D. Okla. Jul. 21, 2015)

Opinion

No. CIV-14-1192-C

07-21-2015

JERRY D. HODGES, Petitioner, v. JASON BRYANT, Warden, Respondent.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION

This action for habeas corpus relief brought by a prisoner, proceeding pro se, was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Charles B. Goodwin, consistent with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Judge Goodwin entered a Report and Recommendation on June 30, 2015, to which Petitioner has timely objected. The Court therefore considers the matter de novo.

The facts and law are accurately set out in the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation and there is no purpose to be served in repeating them yet again. Although Petitioer's Objection alleges several theories to avoid the time bar, none are supported by either the facts or the law.

Accordingly, the Court adopts, in its entirety, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and for the reasons announced therein, is dismissed, as untimely. As no amendment can cure the defect, this dismissal acts as an adjudication on the merits, and a judgment will enter.

IT IS SO ORDERED this 21st day of July, 2015.

/s/_________

ROBIN J. CAUTHRON

United States District Judge


Summaries of

Hodges v. Bryant

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA
Jul 21, 2015
No. CIV-14-1192-C (W.D. Okla. Jul. 21, 2015)
Case details for

Hodges v. Bryant

Case Details

Full title:JERRY D. HODGES, Petitioner, v. JASON BRYANT, Warden, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF OKLAHOMA

Date published: Jul 21, 2015

Citations

No. CIV-14-1192-C (W.D. Okla. Jul. 21, 2015)

Citing Cases

Car Mfg. Co. v. Rolling Mill Co.

The court can reverse the case as to the issues involved in plaintiff's cause of action without disturbing…