From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hodges v. Baker

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 3, 2022
3:20-cv-00498-RFB-WGC (D. Nev. Jan. 3, 2022)

Opinion

3:20-cv-00498-RFB-WGC

01-03-2022

STEVEN BRADLEY HODGES, Plaintiff v. RENEE BAKER, et. al., Defendants


ORDER

RE: ECF NO. 12

WILLIAM G. COBB, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Plaintiff filed his original complaint, which the court screened, and allowed Plaintiff to proceed with an Eighth Amendment failure to protect claim against Munn in Count I; a due process claim against Walsh in Count III, and a First Amendment free exercise claim against Stogner in Count IV. Defendants Baker, Dzurenda, and Daniels were dismissed from Count I without prejudice. Count II was dismissed without prejudice so that Plaintiff could assert his negligence claim in State court. (ECF No. 5.) A limited notice of appearance was entered on Defendants' behalf for the purpose of participating in an early mediation conference, which was unsuccessful. (ECF Nos. 7, 9.)

On October 26, 2021, the court granted Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis and ordered the Attorney General to file a notice of acceptance of service by November 16, 2021. (ECF No. 11.) On November 10, 2021, Plaintiff filed the first amended complaint. (ECF No. 12.) On November 15, 2021, service was accepted on behalf of Munn and Walsh, and a last known address was filed under seal for Stogner. (ECF Nos. 14, 15.)

On December 27, 2021, Walsh and Munn filed their answer to the original complaint. (ECF No. 20.)

“A party may amend its pleading once as a matter of course within: (A) 21 days after serving it, or (B) if the pleading is one to which a responsive pleading is required, 21 days after service of a responsive pleading or 21 days after service of a motion under Rule 12(b), (e), or (f), whichever is earlier.” Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a)(1)(A), (B). Otherwise, a party must seek the opposing party's written consent or leave of court to amend a pleading. Fed.R.Civ.P. 15(a)(2).

Here, Plaintiff filed his amended complaint before service was accepted, and before the responsive pleading was filed; therefore, Rule 15(a)(1) is not applicable and Plaintiff was required to seek permission from the opposing parties or seek leave of court before filing an amended complaint.

Plaintiff has 30 days, until February 2, 2022, to file a motion for leave to amend regarding his proposed amended complaint (ECF No. 12.) Defendants shall have until February 16, 2022, to file a response to the motion. Plaintiff has until February 23, 2022 to file any reply brief.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hodges v. Baker

United States District Court, District of Nevada
Jan 3, 2022
3:20-cv-00498-RFB-WGC (D. Nev. Jan. 3, 2022)
Case details for

Hodges v. Baker

Case Details

Full title:STEVEN BRADLEY HODGES, Plaintiff v. RENEE BAKER, et. al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, District of Nevada

Date published: Jan 3, 2022

Citations

3:20-cv-00498-RFB-WGC (D. Nev. Jan. 3, 2022)