From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hodge v. Marshall

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Mar 26, 2024
3:23-cv-05927-DGE (W.D. Wash. Mar. 26, 2024)

Opinion

3:23-cv-05927-DGE

03-26-2024

TYQUEZ HODGE, Plaintiff, v. NATASHA MARSHALL et al., Defendant.


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION (DKT. NO. 6)

David G. Estudillo United States District Judge

This matter comes before the Court on the Report and Recommendation of the Honorable David W. Christel, Chief United States Magistrate Judge. (Dkt. No. 6.) Plaintiff filed no objections. Having de novo reviewed the Report and Recommendation, the proposed amended complaint (Dkt. No. 4), and the remainder of the record, the Court ORDERS the following:

1. The Report and Recommendation is ADOPTED.

2. Plaintiff's application to proceed in forma pauperis (Dkt. No. 1) is DENIED and the case is DISMISSED without prejudice;

3. The Clerk shall enter JUDGMENT and close this case; and

4. Copies of this order shall be sent to all parties and Judge Christel.


Summaries of

Hodge v. Marshall

United States District Court, Western District of Washington
Mar 26, 2024
3:23-cv-05927-DGE (W.D. Wash. Mar. 26, 2024)
Case details for

Hodge v. Marshall

Case Details

Full title:TYQUEZ HODGE, Plaintiff, v. NATASHA MARSHALL et al., Defendant.

Court:United States District Court, Western District of Washington

Date published: Mar 26, 2024

Citations

3:23-cv-05927-DGE (W.D. Wash. Mar. 26, 2024)