From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hodge v. Inch

United States District Court, Northern District of Florida
Jan 3, 2022
4:21cv107-WS/EMT (N.D. Fla. Jan. 3, 2022)

Opinion

4:21cv107-WS/EMT

01-03-2022

KIMOY HODGE, Petitioner, v. MARK S. INCH, Respondent.


ORDER DISMISSING PETITIONER'S PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS

WILLIAM STAFFORD SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Before the court is the magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF No. 18) docketed November 23, 2021. The magistrate judge recommends that Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus be DISMISSED as untimely. Petitioner has filed objections (ECF No. 19) to the magistrate judge's report and recommendation, and those objections have been carefully reviewed by the undersigned.

Upon review of the record in light of Petitioner's objections, the court has determined that the magistrate judge's report and recommendation is due to be adopted. Like the magistrate judge, the undersigned finds that Petitioner has not met the standard for gaining federal review of his time-barred petition through the fundamental miscarriage of justice exception.

Accordingly, it is ORDERED:

1. The magistrate judge's report and recommendation (ECF No. 18) is hereby ADOPTED and incorporated by reference into this order.

2. Respondent's motion to dismiss (ECF No. 10) is GRANTED.

3. Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus (ECF No. 1) is DISMISSED with prejudice as untimely.

4. The clerk shall enter judgment stating: "Petitioner's petition for writ of habeas corpus is DISMISSED."

5. A certificate of appealability is DENIED.

DONE AND ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hodge v. Inch

United States District Court, Northern District of Florida
Jan 3, 2022
4:21cv107-WS/EMT (N.D. Fla. Jan. 3, 2022)
Case details for

Hodge v. Inch

Case Details

Full title:KIMOY HODGE, Petitioner, v. MARK S. INCH, Respondent.

Court:United States District Court, Northern District of Florida

Date published: Jan 3, 2022

Citations

4:21cv107-WS/EMT (N.D. Fla. Jan. 3, 2022)