From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hodge v. Berger

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Mar 5, 2015
14-CV-4031 (WFK) (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 5, 2015)

Opinion

14-CV-4031 (WFK)

03-05-2015

PATRICIA HODGE, Plaintiff, v. TENENBAUM BERGER & SHIVERS, LLP, Defendant.


NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WILLIAM F. KUNTZ, II, United States District Judge

On June 27, 2014, plaintiff Patricia Hodge, appearing pro se, filed this action against the law firm that previously represented her in a state court action, seeking declaratory and monetary damages. Dkt. 1. Plaintiff paid the filing fee to commence this action. By Decision and Order dated July 3, 2014 ("Order"), the Court dismissed the Complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Rule 12(h)(3) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure ("Fed. R. Civ. P."). Dkt. 4. On July 3, 2014, the Clerk of Court entered Judgment in favor of Defendant. Dkt. 5. Thereafter, Plaintiff filed a timely Notice of Appeal. By Mandate issued on January 13, 2015, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit dismissed Plaintiff's appeal. On February 6, 2015, Plaintiff moved for reconsideration of the Court's Order, see Dkt. 29, which was denied by Order dated February 19, 2015. Dkt. 30. Plaintiff now moves for "emergency relief, to remand this case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, to U.S. District Court Eastern District of New York" pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(d)(2). Dkt. 31.

Rule 41(d)(2) does not provide for the relief Plaintiff seeks and there is no basis to liberally construe Plaintiff's request as arising under any other Federal Rule or under a federal statute. The Second Circuit dismissed Plaintiff's appeal and did not remand the case to this Court for further proceedings.

CONCLUSION

Accordingly, Plaintiff's motion is DENIED. No further action will be taken in this case. The Clerk of Court is hereby directed to return without filing any further submissions filed under this docket number, other than a notice of appeal, to the Plaintiff. Although Plaintiff paid the filing fee to commence this action, the Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this Order would not be taken in good faith and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962).

SO ORDERED.

/S/ Judge William F. Kuntz, II

WILLIAM F. KUNTZ, II

United States District Judge
Dated: March 5, 2015

Brooklyn, New York


Summaries of

Hodge v. Berger

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
Mar 5, 2015
14-CV-4031 (WFK) (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 5, 2015)
Case details for

Hodge v. Berger

Case Details

Full title:PATRICIA HODGE, Plaintiff, v. TENENBAUM BERGER & SHIVERS, LLP, Defendant.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK

Date published: Mar 5, 2015

Citations

14-CV-4031 (WFK) (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 5, 2015)