From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hodge v. Beaman

Supreme Court of Michigan
Sep 6, 1940
293 N.W. 710 (Mich. 1940)

Opinion

Docket No. 21, Calendar No. 41,081.

Submitted June 5, 1940.

Decided September 6, 1940.

Appeal from Wayne; Gilbert (Parm C.), J., presiding. Submitted June 5, 1940. (Docket No. 21, Calendar No. 41,081.) Decided September 6, 1940.

Case by Dorothy Hodge against Charles L. Beaman for personal injuries sustained while riding as a guest passenger in defendant's automobile. Directed verdict and judgment for defendant. Plaintiff appeals. Affirmed.

Louis B. Ver Wiebe, for plaintiff.

Henry C.L. Forler and Cyril C. Pulford, for defendant.


This is a guest passenger case. The alleged gross negligence or wilful and wanton misconduct of defendant consisted in driving, in the afternoon of a summer day, at 40 miles per hour in a driving rain and high wind and poor visibility and, while trying to pass a truck upon a three-lane highway, contact with an oncoming automobile caused defendant's car to swing around on the wet pavement into the path of another car and in the collision plaintiff was seriously injured. The court directed a verdict for defendant and this appeal is by plaintiff. This did not constitute gross negligence or wilful and wanton misconduct.

Affirmed.

See Findlay v. Davis, 263 Mich. 179; Grabowski v. Seyler, 261 Mich. 473; Keilitz v. Elley, 276 Mich. 701; Rowe v. Vander Kolk, 278 Mich. 564; Raby v. Dodge, 279 Mich. 626; In re Mueller's Estate, 280 Mich. 203.

Defendant will recover costs.

BUSHNELL, C.J., and SHARPE, CHANDLER, NORTH, McALLISTER, and BUTZEL, JJ., concurred. The late Justice POTTER took no part in this decision.


Summaries of

Hodge v. Beaman

Supreme Court of Michigan
Sep 6, 1940
293 N.W. 710 (Mich. 1940)
Case details for

Hodge v. Beaman

Case Details

Full title:HODGE v. BEAMAN

Court:Supreme Court of Michigan

Date published: Sep 6, 1940

Citations

293 N.W. 710 (Mich. 1940)
293 N.W. 710

Citing Cases

Rinkevich v. Coeling

They are so numerous and in some instances so irreconcilable with other decisions that it would serve no…