From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hodge v. Acorn Brass Mfg. Co.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Apr 1, 1906
50 Misc. 627 (N.Y. App. Term 1906)

Opinion

April, 1906.

Bookstaver Norton (Harry J. Sondheim, of counsel), for appellant.

Respondent filing no brief.


The defendant is a foreign corporation and, claiming never to have been served with a summons in this action, appeals by virtue of the provisions of section 311 of the Municipal Court Act, from a judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff and, upon appeal, submits affidavits in support of its contention. The affidavits are clear and explicit, and substantially uncontradicted, to the effect that service of the summons was made upon a person who was not an officer of the defendant corporation, or the cashier, director or managing agent thereof. The person served was not an agent of the defendant in any respect, but had authority only to sell its goods in this city at a stated price. Under such circumstances the court below acquired no jurisdiction over the defendant and the judgment must be reversed.

Present: SCOTT, TRUAX and BISCHOFF, JJ.

Judgment reversed, with costs, and complaint dismissed.


Summaries of

Hodge v. Acorn Brass Mfg. Co.

Supreme Court, Appellate Term
Apr 1, 1906
50 Misc. 627 (N.Y. App. Term 1906)
Case details for

Hodge v. Acorn Brass Mfg. Co.

Case Details

Full title:SCHUYLER C. HODGE, Respondent, v . THE ACORN BRASS MANUFACTURING COMPANY…

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Term

Date published: Apr 1, 1906

Citations

50 Misc. 627 (N.Y. App. Term 1906)
98 N.Y.S. 673