From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hoddevik v. Arctic Alaska Fisheries Corp.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1
Apr 28, 1999
975 P.2d 563 (Wash. Ct. App. 1999)

Opinion


975 P.2d 563 (Wash.App. Div. 1 1999) Danelle HODDEVIK, Respondent, v. ARCTIC ALASKA FISHERIES CORPORATION, et al., Appellant. No. 41227-2-1. Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1. April 28, 1999

       ORDER CHANGING OPINION

       The panel having determined that the opinion should be changed, it is hereby ORDERED that the opinion of this court in the above-entitled case filed February 1, 1999 , be changed as follows:

On page seven of the opinion, the second full paragraph [second column, first full paragraph of page 832 of 970 P.2d], last sentence reading as:

But we need not determine as a matter of law whether the jury verdict on these unseaworthiness instructions disposes of Hoddevik's Jones Act claim because we are persuaded by Arctic's alternative argument that a reversal is required.

       shall be changed to read as follows:

However, we do not conclude that a jury could not so decide.

       The remainder of the opinion shall remain the same.


Summaries of

Hoddevik v. Arctic Alaska Fisheries Corp.

Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1
Apr 28, 1999
975 P.2d 563 (Wash. Ct. App. 1999)
Case details for

Hoddevik v. Arctic Alaska Fisheries Corp.

Case Details

Full title:Danelle HODDEVIK, Respondent, v. ARCTIC ALASKA FISHERIES CORPORATION, et…

Court:Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 1

Date published: Apr 28, 1999

Citations

975 P.2d 563 (Wash. Ct. App. 1999)

Citing Cases

Winkler v. Coastal Tow.

984 F.2d at 1280. In Hoddevik v. Artic Alaska Fisheries Corp., 970 P.2d 828 (Wash.App. Div. 1, 1999), amended…