From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hochstein v. Vanderveer Crossings, Inc. No. 2

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 12, 1912
150 App. Div. 121 (N.Y. App. Div. 1912)

Opinion

April 12, 1912.

Charles C. Clark, for the appellant.

Abraham A. Silberberg, for the respondent Hochstein.

Julius G. Kremer, for the respondent Feldman.


The question presented on this appeal is similar to the one presented in action No. 1 between the same parties ( 150 App. Div. 118), decided herewith, and for the reasons given in the opinion in that case the judgment and order here appealed from are reversed and a new trial ordered, with costs to appellant to abide event.

INGRAHAM, P.J., CLARKE, SCOTT and DOWLING, JJ., concurred.

Judgment reversed, new trial ordered, costs to appellant to abide event.


Summaries of

Hochstein v. Vanderveer Crossings, Inc. No. 2

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 12, 1912
150 App. Div. 121 (N.Y. App. Div. 1912)
Case details for

Hochstein v. Vanderveer Crossings, Inc. No. 2

Case Details

Full title:LOUIS HOCHSTEIN and ABRAHAM FELDMAN, Respondents, v . VANDERVEER…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 12, 1912

Citations

150 App. Div. 121 (N.Y. App. Div. 1912)
134 N.Y.S. 952