Hochstein v. Microsoft Corporation

Full title: PETER A. HOCHSTEIN, ET AL., Plaintiffs, v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, ET AL.…

Court: United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Jul 27, 2007

CASE NO. 04-CV-73071 (E.D. Mich. Jul. 27, 2007)

Opinion

CASE NO. 04-CV-73071.

July 27, 2007

ORDER (1) REVERSING THE COURT'S JUNE 28, 2007 ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT SCEA'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF; (2) GRANTING DEFENDANT SCEA'S MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE A SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF; AND (3) PERMITTING PLAINTIFFS TO FILE A SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF IN RESPONSE

PAUL BORMAN, District Judge

Upon reconsideration of the Court's June 28, 2007 Order Denying Defendant SCEA's Motion for Leave to File a Supplemental Brief, the Court REVERSES the June 28 Order; GRANTS Defendant SCEA's June 25, 2007 Motion for Leave to File a Supplemental Brief (Doc. No. 233); and PERMITS Plaintiffs to file a Response brief, not to exceed five (5) pages, to address the possible relevance pf the recent Federal Circuit decision Biomedino, L.L.C. v. Waters Techs Corp., ___ F.3d ___, 1732121 (Fed. Cir. June 18, 2007) to the instant case, within fourteen (14) days of this Order.

SO ORDERED.