From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hochstein v. Microsoft Corporation

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Jun 22, 2009
Case Number: 04-73071 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 22, 2009)

Summary

declining to define "microprocessor" as a means-plus-function term

Summary of this case from Gray Mfg. v. Sefac S.A.

Opinion

Case Number: 04-73071.

June 22, 2009


ORDER (1) GRANTING MICROSOFT'S MOTION FOR CONSTRUCTION OF CLAIM 39; AND (2) ADOPTING IN ENTIRETY THE SPECIAL MASTER'S MAY 16, 2009 REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


Before the Court are: 1) Microsoft's Motion for Construction of Claim 39 (Doc. No. 342); 2) Microsoft's Motion Objecting to the Special Master's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 414); and 3) Plaintiffs' Motion to Adopt the Special Master's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 416).

The parties having consented to the appointment of a Special Master, on April 16, 2009 the Court appointed Richard Grauer to serve as Special Master, and referred Microsoft's Motion for Construction of Claim 39 to Special Master Grauer. (Doc. No. 349). Special Master Grauer issued his Report and Recommendation on May 16, 2009. Thereafter, the parties filed their respective motions pertaining to the Special Master's R R.

Having reviewed the record, the Court:

1) GRANTS Microsoft's Motion for Construction of Claim 39 (Doc. No. 342);
2) DENIES Microsoft's Motion Objecting to the Special Master's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 414); and
3) GRANTS Plaintiffs' Motion to Adopt the Special Master's Report and Recommendation (Doc. No. 416).

SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hochstein v. Microsoft Corporation

United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division
Jun 22, 2009
Case Number: 04-73071 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 22, 2009)

declining to define "microprocessor" as a means-plus-function term

Summary of this case from Gray Mfg. v. Sefac S.A.
Case details for

Hochstein v. Microsoft Corporation

Case Details

Full title:PETER A. HOCHSTEIN, et al., Plaintiff, v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION, Defendant

Court:United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division

Date published: Jun 22, 2009

Citations

Case Number: 04-73071 (E.D. Mich. Jun. 22, 2009)

Citing Cases

VLSI Tech. v. Intel Corp.

Rather, VLSI argues, the parenthetical in "reference signal (VSS)" refers to examples of the "reference…

Gray Mfg. v. Sefac S.A.

The Court finds "microprocessor" to be sufficiently definite and § 112, ¶ 6 therefore does not apply. See…