From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hochman v. Prudential Property & Cas. Ins. Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 14, 2005
143 F. App'x 821 (9th Cir. 2005)

Opinion

Submitted September 12, 2005.

This panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R.App. P. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

David R. Shaub, Esq., Shaub & Williams, Los Angeles, CA, for Plaintiffs.

David B. Casselman, Esq., Wasserman, Comden & Casselman, Tarzana, CA, for Creditors.

Alan M. Kindred, Buchalter Neimer Fields & Younger, Los Angeles, CA, for Appellee.


Appeals from the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Consuelo B. Marshall, Chief Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-95-02397-CBM.

Before: GRABER and W. FLETCHER, Circuit Judges, and FOGEL, District Judge.

The Honorable Jeremy D. Fogel, United States District Judge for the Northern District of California, sitting by designation.

MEMORANDUM

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

For the reasons given by the district court in its orders of November 20, 2001, and December 19, 2004, the decision of the district court is AFFIRMED.


Summaries of

Hochman v. Prudential Property & Cas. Ins. Co.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Sep 14, 2005
143 F. App'x 821 (9th Cir. 2005)
Case details for

Hochman v. Prudential Property & Cas. Ins. Co.

Case Details

Full title:Allan HOCHMAN; Judith Hochman, Plaintiffs, v. PRUDENTIAL PROPERTY …

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Sep 14, 2005

Citations

143 F. App'x 821 (9th Cir. 2005)