From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hobush v. Consolidated Rail Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 20, 1986
117 A.D.2d 927 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Opinion

February 20, 1986

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Ulster County (Bradley, J.).


In April 1984, plaintiff was injured when his automobile collided with a locomotive owned and operated by defendant. Plaintiff subsequently commenced this lawsuit seeking compensatory damages for personal injuries and property damage suffered in the accident. Plaintiff also asserted, as a separate cause of action, a claim for punitive damages. Defendant's motion to dismiss the separate cause of action for punitive damages was denied. This appeal ensued.

It is well established that punitive damages may not be sought in a separate cause of action (Collision Plan Unlimited v Bankers Trust Co., 63 N.Y.2d 827, 831). Here, however, plaintiff's underlying cause of action for compensatory damages has not been dismissed (cf. Ferrucci v. State of New York, 42 A.D.2d 359, 362, affd 34 N.Y.2d 881). Therefore, we construe the allegations contained in that part of the complaint denoted as a second cause of action to be part of plaintiff's first cause of action (see generally, Siegel, N Y Prac § 208, at 245-246).

Order modified, on the law, without costs, by striking from the complaint the caption entitled "as and for a second cause of action" and paragraph nine, and, as so modified, affirmed. Mahoney, P.J., Casey, Mikoll, Yesawich, Jr., and Harvey, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hobush v. Consolidated Rail Corporation

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Feb 20, 1986
117 A.D.2d 927 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)
Case details for

Hobush v. Consolidated Rail Corporation

Case Details

Full title:ALBERT HOBUSH, Respondent, v. CONSOLIDATED RAIL CORPORATION, Also Known as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Feb 20, 1986

Citations

117 A.D.2d 927 (N.Y. App. Div. 1986)

Citing Cases

Leavitt-Berner Tanning Corp. v. American Home Assurance Co.

Main, J.P. In a case from the recent past, this court encountered and addressed the issues presented in the…

Home Insurance Company of Ind. v. Karantonis

Moreover, to succeed in showing entitlement to punitive damages, defendants would have to present an…