Opinion
2013-06-7
Todd M. HOBIN, Plaintiff–Respondent, v. Candice L. HOBIN, Defendant–Appellant.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (David A. Murad, J.), entered December 15, 2011. The order, inter alia, granted plaintiff sole legal and physical custody of the parties' youngest child. Candice L. Hobin, Defendant–Appellant Pro Se. Getnick, Livingston, Atkinson & Priore, LLP, Utica (Thomas L. Atkinson of Counsel), for Plaintiff–Respondent.
Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (David A. Murad, J.), entered December 15, 2011. The order, inter alia, granted plaintiff sole legal and physical custody of the parties' youngest child.
Candice L. Hobin, Defendant–Appellant Pro Se. Getnick, Livingston, Atkinson & Priore, LLP, Utica (Thomas L. Atkinson of Counsel), for Plaintiff–Respondent.
John G. Koslosky, Attorney for the Child, Utica.
It is hereby ORDERED that the order so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs for reasons stated in the decision at Supreme Court.