From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hobbs v. Province

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Jul 22, 2008
No. CIV-08-0260-C (W.D. Okla. Jul. 22, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV-08-0260-C.

July 22, 2008


ORDER ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION


This action for habeas corpus relief brought by a prisoner, proceeding pro se, was referred to United States Magistrate Judge Robert E. Bacharach, consistent with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Judge Bacharach entered a Report and Recommendation on June 16, 2008, to which Petitioner has timely objected. The Court therefore considers the matter de novo.

The facts and relevant law are set out in full in the accurate and well-reasoned opinion of the Magistrate Judge. No point would be served in repeating that analysis. There is nothing asserted by the Petitioner which was not fully considered and correctly rejected by the Magistrate Judge, and no argument of fact or law is set forth in the objection which would require a different result.

Accordingly, the Court adopts, in its entirety, the Report and Recommendation of the Magistrate Judge, and for the reasons announced therein, denies this petition for habeas corpus relief. A judgment will enter accordingly.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Hobbs v. Province

United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma
Jul 22, 2008
No. CIV-08-0260-C (W.D. Okla. Jul. 22, 2008)
Case details for

Hobbs v. Province

Case Details

Full title:MICHAEL HOBBS, Petitioner v. WARDEN PROVINCE, Respondent

Court:United States District Court, W.D. Oklahoma

Date published: Jul 22, 2008

Citations

No. CIV-08-0260-C (W.D. Okla. Jul. 22, 2008)