Hobbs v. Cashwell

2 Citing cases

  1. Carter v. Reaves

    83 S.E. 248 (N.C. 1914)   Cited 15 times

    " The same is true of assignments 14, 15, 16, 17, and 18. These matters have been so often called to the attention of counsel that it is strange indeed that the rules as to presenting error on appeal should be thus disregarded in any case. As late as Wheeler v. Cole, 164 N.C. 380, the Court again said that "it would not consider exceptions not set out in compliance with the plain requirements of our rules as construed by this Court in Davis v. Wall, 142 N.C. 450; Marable v. R. R., ib., 564; Lee v. Baird, 146 N.C. 361; Thompson v. R. R., 147 N.C. 412; Ullery v. Guthrie, 148 N.C. 417; Smith v. Mfg. Co., 151 N.C. 260; Pegram v. Hester, 152 N.C. 765; McDowell v. Kent, 153 (133) N.C. 555; Jones v. R. R., ib., 419; Hobbs v. Cashwell, 158 N.C. 597." The Court then added: "This rule has been frequently called to the attention of counsel throughout a long period of years. It has been substantially adopted by all other courts and perhaps in all of them it is enforced more rigidly than with us. It bears equally on all, and should be observed, as it is intended for the benefit of litigants and counsel as well as for the better transaction of business in this Court and the more intelligent disposition of causes. It is easily complied with, if our brethren of the Bar will endeavor to meet its requirements.

  2. Davis v. Wall

    55 S.E. 350 (N.C. 1906)   Cited 13 times

    Appeal Dismissed. Cited: Woody v. Fountain, 143 N.C. 71; Green v. Williams, 144 N.C. 63; Lee v. Baird, 146 N.C. 364; Smith v. Mfg. Co., 151 N.C. 262; Whitfield v. Lumber Co., 152 N.C. 214; Pegram v. Hester, Ib., 766; Jones v. R. R., 153 N.C. 421, 423; Williams v. Lumber Co., 154 N.C. 310; Brown v. Hutchinson, 155 N.C. 207; Hobbs v. Cashwell, 158 N.C. 597.