From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hobar Enterprises LLC v. Yada Yada Yada, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 27, 2015
No. 1:13-cv-01811-SKO (E.D. Cal. Jul. 27, 2015)

Opinion

No. 1:13-cv-01811-SKO

07-27-2015

HOBAR ENTERPRISES, LLC, Plaintiff, v. YADA YADA, YADA, INC. dba APR AVIATION, INC., Defendant.


ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE CASE

On July 17, 2015, the parties' filed a stipulation that the action be dismissed with prejudice, each side to bear their own attorney fees and costs.

In relevant part, Rule 41(a)(1)(A) provides as follows:

[A] plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing: (i) a notice of dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment; or (ii) a stipulation of dismissal signed by all parties who have appeared.
Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A). Rule 41 thus allows the parties to dismiss an action voluntarily, after service of an answer, by filing a written stipulation to dismiss signed by all of the parties who have appeared, although an oral stipulation in open court will also suffice. See Eitel v. McCool, 782 F.2d 1470, 1472-73 (9th Cir. 1986).

Once the stipulation between the parties who have appeared is properly filed or made in open court, no order of the court is necessary to effectuate dismissal. Case authority concerning stipulated dismissals under Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii) provides that the entry of such a stipulation of dismissal is effective automatically and does not require judicial approval. Commercial Space Mgmt. Co. v. Boeing Co., 193 F.3d 1074, 1077 (9th Cir. 1999).

Because the parties have filed a stipulation for dismissal of this case with prejudice under that is signed by all parties, this case has terminated pursuant to the parties' stipulated terms. Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii).

Accordingly IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is to administratively close this case. IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 27 , 2015

/s/ Sheila K. Oberto

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Hobar Enterprises LLC v. Yada Yada Yada, Inc.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Jul 27, 2015
No. 1:13-cv-01811-SKO (E.D. Cal. Jul. 27, 2015)
Case details for

Hobar Enterprises LLC v. Yada Yada Yada, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:HOBAR ENTERPRISES, LLC, Plaintiff, v. YADA YADA, YADA, INC. dba APR…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Jul 27, 2015

Citations

No. 1:13-cv-01811-SKO (E.D. Cal. Jul. 27, 2015)