From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hoard v. California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 2, 2011
No. 2:11-cv-2221 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 2, 2011)

Opinion

No. 2:11-cv-2221 KJN P

09-02-2011

WILLIAM H. HOARD, III, Petitioner, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent.


ORDER

Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In his application, petitioner challenges a conviction issued by the Kern County Superior Court. Kern County is part of the Fresno Division of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California. See Local Rule 120(d). Petitioner has not paid the filing fee or filed a request to proceed in forma pauperis.

Pursuant to Local Rule 120(f), a civil action which has not been commenced in the proper division of a court may, on the court's own motion, be transferred to the proper division of the court. Therefore, this action will be transferred to the Fresno Division of the court.

Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. This action is transferred to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of California sitting in Fresno; and

2. All future filings shall reference the new Fresno case number assigned and shall be filed at:

United States District Court
Eastern District of California
2500 Tulare Street
Fresno, CA 93721

KENDALL J. NEWMAN

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE


Summaries of

Hoard v. California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Sep 2, 2011
No. 2:11-cv-2221 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 2, 2011)
Case details for

Hoard v. California

Case Details

Full title:WILLIAM H. HOARD, III, Petitioner, v. STATE OF CALIFORNIA, Respondent.

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Sep 2, 2011

Citations

No. 2:11-cv-2221 KJN P (E.D. Cal. Sep. 2, 2011)