From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hoar v. Maine

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Sep 23, 2011
No. 1:11-cv-314-DBH (D. Me. Sep. 23, 2011)

Opinion

No. 1:11-cv-314-DBH

09-23-2011

RICHARD HOAR, PETITIONER v. STATE OF MAINE, RESPONDENT


ORDER AFFIRMING RECOMMENDED DECISION

OF THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE

On August 29, 2011, the United States Magistrate Judge filed with the court, with a copy of the petitioner, her Recommended Decision. The time within which to file objections expired on September 15, 2011, and no objection has been filed. The Magistrate Judge notified the defendant that failure to object would waive his right to de novo review and appeal.

It is therefore ORDERED that the Recommended Decision of the Magistrate Judge is hereby ADOPTED. The matter is dismissed for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with the procedural orders of this Court.

SO ORDERED.

D. BROCK HORNBY

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE


Summaries of

Hoar v. Maine

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE
Sep 23, 2011
No. 1:11-cv-314-DBH (D. Me. Sep. 23, 2011)
Case details for

Hoar v. Maine

Case Details

Full title:RICHARD HOAR, PETITIONER v. STATE OF MAINE, RESPONDENT

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE

Date published: Sep 23, 2011

Citations

No. 1:11-cv-314-DBH (D. Me. Sep. 23, 2011)