From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hoang v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 21, 2013
Case No.: 13-CV-00582-EJD (N.D. Cal. Mar. 21, 2013)

Opinion

Case No.: 13-CV-00582-EJD

03-21-2013

SUSAN B. HOANG AND DANIEL X. HOANG, Plaintiffs, v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.; DREAMSKY INVESTMENTS LLC; DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANYL CALIFORNIA RECONVEYANCE COMPANY; DOES 1-100, Defendants.

KIRKMAN J. HOFFMAN, ESQ. Attorney at Law, #148663 Attorney for Defendant, DREAMSKY INVESTMENTS LLC MICHAEL JAMES YESK, as Attorney for Plaintiffs


KIRKMAN J. HOFFMAN, ESQ.
Attorney at Law, #148663
Attorney for Defendant,
DREAMSKY INVESTMENTS LLC

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO

SHORTEN TIME AND ADVANCE

HEARING DATE ON DEFENDANT

DREAMSKY INVESTMENTS LLC'S

MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO

EXPUNGE LIS PENDENS


[Local Civil Rules 6-1,6-2,and 7-12]


Hearing Date: 7/5/13

Hon. Edward J. Davila


STIPULATION AND ORDER TO SHORTEN TIME AND ADVANCE HEARING DATE

ON MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO EXPUNGE LIS PENDENS

COME NOW THE PARTIES TO THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED ACTION, Plaintiffs SUSAN B. HOANG and DANIEL X. HOANG (herein, "Plaintiffs"), with and through their attorney of record, Michael James Yesk, and the Defendant DREAMSKY INVESTMENTS LLC (herein "Defendant"), with and through its attorney of record, Kirkman J. Hoffman, who mutually stipulate and agree to shorten time and advance the date on the hearing of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and Motion Expunge Lis Pendens, as follows:

1. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Expunge Lis Pendens, on file in this action and currently set for hearing at 9:00 a.m. on 7/5/13, shall be advanced and reset for hearing on 4/12/13 at 9:00am , or as soon thereafter as such motions may be heard, in Dept. 4 of this Court, pursuant to this Stipulation and Order.
2. Plaintiffs shall have 14 days from the filing of Defendant's motions on 3/11/13 (i.e., until 3/25/13) to file and serve any Opposition to such motions, and Defendant shall have seven (7) days from the filing and service of such Opposition to file any Reply.
APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CONTENT:

By ____________________

KIRKMAN J. HOFFMAN, as Attorney

For Defendant DREAMSKY INVESTMENTS LLC

By ___________________

MICHAEL JAMES YESK, as Attorney for Plaintiffs

ORDER

PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

The Ex Parte application (Docket Item no. 14) is terminated as MOOT.

____________________

U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE


Summaries of

Hoang v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Mar 21, 2013
Case No.: 13-CV-00582-EJD (N.D. Cal. Mar. 21, 2013)
Case details for

Hoang v. JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A.

Case Details

Full title:SUSAN B. HOANG AND DANIEL X. HOANG, Plaintiffs, v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK…

Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

Date published: Mar 21, 2013

Citations

Case No.: 13-CV-00582-EJD (N.D. Cal. Mar. 21, 2013)