Opinion
Case No.: 13-CV-00582-EJD
03-21-2013
SUSAN B. HOANG AND DANIEL X. HOANG, Plaintiffs, v. JP MORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A.; DREAMSKY INVESTMENTS LLC; DEUTSCHE BANK NATIONAL TRUST COMPANYL CALIFORNIA RECONVEYANCE COMPANY; DOES 1-100, Defendants.
KIRKMAN J. HOFFMAN, ESQ. Attorney at Law, #148663 Attorney for Defendant, DREAMSKY INVESTMENTS LLC MICHAEL JAMES YESK, as Attorney for Plaintiffs
KIRKMAN J. HOFFMAN, ESQ.
Attorney at Law, #148663
Attorney for Defendant,
DREAMSKY INVESTMENTS LLC
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
SHORTEN TIME AND ADVANCE
HEARING DATE ON DEFENDANT
DREAMSKY INVESTMENTS LLC'S
MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO
EXPUNGE LIS PENDENS
[Local Civil Rules 6-1,6-2,and 7-12]
Hearing Date: 7/5/13
Hon. Edward J. Davila
STIPULATION AND ORDER TO SHORTEN TIME AND ADVANCE HEARING DATE
ON MOTION TO DISMISS AND MOTION TO EXPUNGE LIS PENDENS
COME NOW THE PARTIES TO THE ABOVE-CAPTIONED ACTION, Plaintiffs SUSAN B. HOANG and DANIEL X. HOANG (herein, "Plaintiffs"), with and through their attorney of record, Michael James Yesk, and the Defendant DREAMSKY INVESTMENTS LLC (herein "Defendant"), with and through its attorney of record, Kirkman J. Hoffman, who mutually stipulate and agree to shorten time and advance the date on the hearing of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and Motion Expunge Lis Pendens, as follows:
1. Defendant's Motion to Dismiss and Motion to Expunge Lis Pendens, on file in this action and currently set for hearing at 9:00 a.m. on 7/5/13, shall be advanced and reset for hearing on 4/12/13 at 9:00am , or as soon thereafter as such motions may be heard, in Dept. 4 of this Court, pursuant to this Stipulation and Order.APPROVED AS TO FORM AND CONTENT:
2. Plaintiffs shall have 14 days from the filing of Defendant's motions on 3/11/13 (i.e., until 3/25/13) to file and serve any Opposition to such motions, and Defendant shall have seven (7) days from the filing and service of such Opposition to file any Reply.
By ____________________
KIRKMAN J. HOFFMAN, as Attorney
For Defendant DREAMSKY INVESTMENTS LLC
By ___________________
MICHAEL JAMES YESK, as Attorney for Plaintiffs
ORDER
PURSUANT TO THE ABOVE STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
The Ex Parte application (Docket Item no. 14) is terminated as MOOT.
____________________
U.S. DISTRICT COURT JUDGE