From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hoag v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Apr 21, 1988
523 So. 2d 788 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Opinion

No. 87-1857.

April 21, 1988.

Appeal from the Circuit Court for Orange County; R. James Stroker, Judge.

James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Larry B. Henderson, Asst. Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, and W. Brian Bayly, Asst. Atty. Gen., Daytona Beach, for appellee.


This is an appeal from a sentence which departs from that recommended by the sentencing guidelines. No written reasons for the departure were given. That is error. State v. Oden, 478 So.2d 51 (Fla. 1985); Matthews v. State, 486 So.2d 47 (Fla. 5th DCA 1986).

SENTENCE VACATED; REMANDED.

COBB and COWART, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Hoag v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District
Apr 21, 1988
523 So. 2d 788 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)
Case details for

Hoag v. State

Case Details

Full title:DANIEL L. HOAG, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District

Date published: Apr 21, 1988

Citations

523 So. 2d 788 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1988)

Citing Cases

Paschen v. State

This is an appeal from a sentence. Appellant alleges and appellee concedes that the sentencing judge erred by…

Johnson v. State

Johnson argues, and the State agrees, that the departure sentence is in error because the trial judge failed…