From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

HO v. POMAZAL

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 14, 2008
No. CIV S-07-0841 WBS EFB P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 14, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-07-0841 WBS EFB P.

October 14, 2008


ORDER


Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local General Order No. 262.

On July 23, 2008, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations herein which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within twenty days. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations.

The court has reviewed the file and, for the reasons set forth in the findings and recommendations, and because defendant has met his burden of showing that plaintiff failed to properly exhaust his available administrative remedies, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that:

1. The findings and recommendations filed July 23, 2008, are adopted in full;

2. Defendant's motion to dismiss pursuant to Rule 12(b) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure is granted; and

3. This action is dismissed without prejudice. See Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b).


Summaries of

HO v. POMAZAL

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 14, 2008
No. CIV S-07-0841 WBS EFB P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 14, 2008)
Case details for

HO v. POMAZAL

Case Details

Full title:HUNG HO, Plaintiff, v. CMO DR. POMAZAL, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 14, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-07-0841 WBS EFB P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 14, 2008)