From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

HO v. HIGHTOWER

United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division
May 9, 2001
Civil Action 00-0090-BH-L (S.D. Ala. May. 9, 2001)

Opinion

Civil Action 00-0090-BH-L

May 9, 2001


JUDGMENT


In accordance with the Order entered on this date, it is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED, and DECREED that the petition for writ of habeas corpus be denied, that the writ not issue and that this cause be and it hereby is dismissed.

ORDER

After due and proper consideration of all portions of this file deemed relevant to the issues raised, and a de novo determination of those portions of the recommendation to which objection is made, the recommendation of the Magistrate Judge made under 28 U.S.C. § 636 (b)(1)(B) and dated the 16th day of April, 2001 is ADOPTED as the opinion of this Court.


Summaries of

HO v. HIGHTOWER

United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division
May 9, 2001
Civil Action 00-0090-BH-L (S.D. Ala. May. 9, 2001)
Case details for

HO v. HIGHTOWER

Case Details

Full title:TRUNG VAN HO, AIS 182276, Petitioner, v. ROY HIGHTOWER, Warden, et al.…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division

Date published: May 9, 2001

Citations

Civil Action 00-0090-BH-L (S.D. Ala. May. 9, 2001)