From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Ho v. D & S Inv.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Sep 3, 2024
8:24-cv-01065-JWH(DFMx) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 3, 2024)

Opinion

8:24-cv-01065-JWH(DFMx)

09-03-2024

John Ho v. D and S Investment, LLC


Present: The Honorable JOHN W. HOLCOMB, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

CIVIL MINUTES- GENERAL

Proceedings: (IN CHAMBERS) Order to Show Cause re Dismissal for Lack of Prosecution

Absent a showing of good cause, an action must be dismissed without prejudice if the summons and complaint are not served on a Defendant within 90 days after the complaint is filed. Fed. R. Civ. Proc. 4(m).

In the present case, it appears that Plaintiff has not served the summons and complaint on one or more Defendants. Accordingly, the Court, on its own motion, hereby orders Plaintiff to show cause in writing on or before September 13, 2024, why this action should not be dismissed, with respect to each Defendant who has not been served, for lack of prosecution. Pursuant to Rule 78ed of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the Court finds that this matter is appropriate for submission without oral argument. This Order to Show Cause will be discharged if Plaintiff files, before the deadline set forth above, a proof of service of the summons and complaint. If the deadline to Answer has already passed, plaintiff(s) must also file a Request for Default or Stipulation Extending Time to Answer.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Ho v. D & S Inv.

United States District Court, Central District of California
Sep 3, 2024
8:24-cv-01065-JWH(DFMx) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 3, 2024)
Case details for

Ho v. D & S Inv.

Case Details

Full title:John Ho v. D and S Investment, LLC

Court:United States District Court, Central District of California

Date published: Sep 3, 2024

Citations

8:24-cv-01065-JWH(DFMx) (C.D. Cal. Sep. 3, 2024)