From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

HO v. ASTRUE

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division
Apr 21, 2010
CIVIL NO. 5:09-cv-3933 JF (N.D. Cal. Apr. 21, 2010)

Opinion

CIVIL NO. 5:09-cv-3933 JF.

April 21, 2010

JOSEPH P. RUSSONIELLO, CSBN 44332, United States Attorney, LUCILLE GONZALES MEIS, SBN CO 15153, Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX, Social Security Administration, SHEA LITA BOND, SBN D.C. 469103, Special Assistant United States Attorney, San Francisco, California, Attorneys for Defendant.


ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME WITHIN WHICH DEFENDANT MAY FILE A RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT


Defendant, through his undersigned attorney, moves this Court for an Order granting Defendant an extension of time until May 14, 2010, within which to file his response to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. This Order is sought on the following grounds:

Defendant's responsive pleading was due April 14, 2010. The undersigned needs additional time to communicate with the Appeals Council regarding the issues raised in Plaintiff's brief.

On April 14, 2010, 2009, the undersigned informed Plaintiff's attorney of this Motion for Extension of Time, and his office stated that they had no objection.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: 4/16/2010


Summaries of

HO v. ASTRUE

United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division
Apr 21, 2010
CIVIL NO. 5:09-cv-3933 JF (N.D. Cal. Apr. 21, 2010)
Case details for

HO v. ASTRUE

Case Details

Full title:PHUONG HO, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Acting Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, N.D. California, San Jose Division

Date published: Apr 21, 2010

Citations

CIVIL NO. 5:09-cv-3933 JF (N.D. Cal. Apr. 21, 2010)