From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

HMAR v. TEXAS COMPANY

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1932
235 App. Div. 731 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)

Opinion

March, 1932.


Order denying motion for a separate trial of the issue as to whether plaintiff accepted compensation under the provisions of the Longshoremen's and Harbor Workers' Compensation Act reversed on the law and the facts, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs. It appears that the trial of the issue, if determined adversely to the plaintiff, will end the litigation and render a trial of the merits unnecessary. Lazansky, P.J., Kapper, Hagarty, Tompkins and Davis, JJ., concur.

See 44 U.S. Stat. at Large, 1424, chap. 509; Id. 1440, § 33; U.S. Code, tit. 33, § 933. — [REP.


Summaries of

HMAR v. TEXAS COMPANY

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Mar 1, 1932
235 App. Div. 731 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)
Case details for

HMAR v. TEXAS COMPANY

Case Details

Full title:THEODORE HMAR, Respondent, v. THE TEXAS COMPANY, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Mar 1, 1932

Citations

235 App. Div. 731 (N.Y. App. Div. 1932)

Citing Cases

Marco v. Sachs

The trial of the separate issue of futility of serving the demand works no prejudice to the plaintiff and may…

Flynn v. Royal Development Co.

( Smith v. Western Pacific R. Co., 144 App. Div. 180, affd. 203 N.Y. 499.) Should it appear that the trial of…