From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

H.M. Weill Company v. Creveling

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 7, 1918
119 N.E. 1048 (N.Y. 1918)

Opinion

Argued April 23, 1918

Decided May 7, 1918

Julius M. Lowenstein and Sidney Rossman for appellant.

Percival C. Smith for respondent.


Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., CHASE, COLLIN, CUDDEBACK, HOGAN, CARDOZO and McLAUGHLIN, JJ.


Summaries of

H.M. Weill Company v. Creveling

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
May 7, 1918
119 N.E. 1048 (N.Y. 1918)
Case details for

H.M. Weill Company v. Creveling

Case Details

Full title:H.M. WEILL COMPANY, Appellant, v . ALBERTINA D. CREVELING, Respondent

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 7, 1918

Citations

119 N.E. 1048 (N.Y. 1918)
119 N.E. 1048

Citing Cases

Trimmer v. Van Bomel

The Appellate Division declared, "It is not for the court to dictate such terms to the parties, for its…

Brause v. Goldman

Further negotiations as to demolition and alteration rights would require agreement as to cost, types of new…