From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

H.L. Langer Co., Inc. v. Friedland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 25, 1990
157 A.D.2d 589 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)

Opinion

January 25, 1990

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Herman Cahn, J.).


In dismissing the fourth and fifth causes of action, the IAS court characterized them as ones for fraud. While such description was correct as to the fourth cause of action, the dismissal of which is not contested on appeal, the fifth cause of action alleges that defendant Schnurmacher Brothers breached its agreement to deal solely and exclusively through plaintiff as a real estate broker in connection with the leasing and subsequent sale of the subject property to the other defendants. Since the record reveals issues of fact relating to this cause, summary judgment must be denied.

Concur — Kupferman, J.P., Kassal, Wallach and Rubin, JJ.


Summaries of

H.L. Langer Co., Inc. v. Friedland

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 25, 1990
157 A.D.2d 589 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
Case details for

H.L. Langer Co., Inc. v. Friedland

Case Details

Full title:H.L. LANGER CO., INC., Appellant-Respondent, v. LAWRENCE FRIEDLAND et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 25, 1990

Citations

157 A.D.2d 589 (N.Y. App. Div. 1990)
550 N.Y.S.2d 335