From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

H.K. v. R.L

Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawaii
Mar 11, 2010
122 Haw. 352 (Haw. Ct. App. 2010)

Summary

holding that family court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to equitably charge husband for a $92,546 down payment on a new house, $4,627 monthly mortgage payments, $22,000 in new furnishings, $30,947 for a new truck, and a $30,000 company debt payment, where wife failed to demonstrate how such expenditures were fiscally irresponsible or occurred "under such circumstances" as to trigger the family court's equitable powers

Summary of this case from JW v. LW

Opinion

No. 29370.

March 11, 2010.


Summary Dispositional Orders Affirmed.


Summaries of

H.K. v. R.L

Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawaii
Mar 11, 2010
122 Haw. 352 (Haw. Ct. App. 2010)

holding that family court did not abuse its discretion in refusing to equitably charge husband for a $92,546 down payment on a new house, $4,627 monthly mortgage payments, $22,000 in new furnishings, $30,947 for a new truck, and a $30,000 company debt payment, where wife failed to demonstrate how such expenditures were fiscally irresponsible or occurred "under such circumstances" as to trigger the family court's equitable powers

Summary of this case from JW v. LW
Case details for

H.K. v. R.L

Case Details

Full title:H.K. v. R.L

Court:Intermediate Court of Appeals of Hawaii

Date published: Mar 11, 2010

Citations

122 Haw. 352 (Haw. Ct. App. 2010)
226 P.3d 522

Citing Cases

JW v. LW

Finally, Mother appears to contend that Father's HELOC expenditures for his own expenses constitute waste…