From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hite v. Lyons Central School District No. 1

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 5, 1960
11 A.D.2d 624 (N.Y. App. Div. 1960)

Opinion

May 5, 1960

Appeal from the Wayne Special Term.

Present — Williams, P.J., Bastow, Goldman, Halpern and McClusky, JJ.


Order unanimously modified in accordance with the memorandum and as modified affirmed, without costs of this appeal to any party. Memorandum: The only motion before the court was addressed to the face of the complaint under rule 106 of the Rules of Civil Practice. However, in the first ordering paragraph of the order appealed from, the court directed respondent's attorneys to deliver a copy of the notice of claim to the attorney for the defendant-appellant. This, we presume, was on the theory that the notice had been irregularly served in good faith by the plaintiff-respondent, even though that question was not directly before the court. Subdivision 6 of section 50-e Gen. Mun. of the General Municipal Law, and particularly the last sentence thereof, authorizes such an order, but if the application is made before trial, it must be made on affidavits. For this reason the first ordering paragraph must be amended by deleting therefrom all language except "Ordered, that said motion be, and the same hereby is, denied." The language of the second ordering paragraph must be amended so that the defendant Lyons Central School District shall be permitted to serve its answer rather than directed to do so.


Summaries of

Hite v. Lyons Central School District No. 1

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department
May 5, 1960
11 A.D.2d 624 (N.Y. App. Div. 1960)
Case details for

Hite v. Lyons Central School District No. 1

Case Details

Full title:ARNOLD G. HITE, an Infant, by ARTHUR G. HITE, His Guardian ad Litem, et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Fourth Department

Date published: May 5, 1960

Citations

11 A.D.2d 624 (N.Y. App. Div. 1960)