See, Malin v. State, 2009 WL 537060, at *5 (Del. Super. 2009) (ineffective assistance of counsel claims are not procedurally barred because a Rule 61 motion is the appropriate vehicle for raising these claims). Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687-88, 694 (1984); Hitchens v. State, 757 A.2d 1278 (Del. 2000). State v. Wright, 653 A.2d 288, 293-94 (citations omitted).
Superior Court Criminal Rule 61(i)(4) bars any claims that were formerly adjudicated, whether in the proceedings leading to the judgment of conviction, in an appeal or in a postconviction proceeding. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687-88, 694 (1984); Hitchens v. State, 757 A.2d 1278 (Del. 2000). State v. Wright, 653 A.2d 288, 293-94 (Del. Super. 1994) (citations omitted).
Defendant must overcome a strong presumption that counsel's conduct was reasonably professional under the circumstances.Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687 (1984); Hitchens v. State, 757 A.2d 1278 (Del. 2000); Somerville v. State, 703 A.2d 629, 631 (1997) (citations omitted). State v. Wright, 653 A.2d 288, 293-94 (Del. Super. 1994) (citations omitted).
State v. Dickinson, 2012 WL 3573943, at *5 (Del. Super., Aug. 17, 2012). Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687-88, 694 (1984); Hitchens v. State, 757 A.2d 1278 (Del. 2000). State v. Hess, 2014 WL 6677714, at * 6 (Del. Super. Nov. 20, 2014) (citations omitted).
To the extent Defendant is attacking his sentence, Defendant was required to comply with Superior Court Criminal Rule 35. Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687-88, 694 (1984); Hitchens v. State, 757 A.2d 1278 (Del. 2000). State v. Hess, 2014 WL 6677714, at * 6 (Del. Super., Nov. 20, 2014) (citations omitted).
Younger v. State, 580 A.2d 552, 554 (Del. 1990). Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687-88, 694 (1984); Hitchens v. State, 757 A.2d 1278 (Del. 2000). State v. Hess, 2014 WL 6677714, at * 6 (Del. Super., Nov. 20, 2014) (citations omitted).
Somerville v. State, 703 A.2d 629, 632-633 (Del. 1997); Superior Court Criminal Rule 11(e). Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687-88, 694 (1984); Hitchens v. State, 757 A.2d 1278 (Del. 2000). State v. Hess, 2014 WL 6677714, at * 6 (Del. Super., Nov. 20, 2014) (citations omitted).
DEFENDANT'S MOTION FOR POSTCONVICTION RELIEFStrickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687-88, 694 (1984); Hitchens v. State, 757 A.2d 1278 (Del. 2000). State v. Wright, 653 A.2d 288, 295 (Del. Super., 1994).
"Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687-88, 694 (1984); Hitchens v. State, 757 A.2d 1278 (Del. 2000). State v. Wright, 653 A.2d 288, 293-94 (Del. Super., 1994) (citations omitted).
When judging a claim of ineffectiveness, the benchmark is "whether counsel's conduct so undermined the proper functioning of the adversarial process that the trial cannot be relied on as having produced a just result."Strickland v. Washington, 466 U.S. 668, 687-88, 694 (1984); Hitchens v. State, 757 A.2d 1278 (Del. 2000). State v. Wright, 653 A.2d 288, 293-94 (Del. Super., 1994) (citations omitted).