From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Histon v. Hearn Department Stores, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 23, 1959
8 A.D.2d 801 (N.Y. App. Div. 1959)

Opinion

June 23, 1959


Order denying conditionally, plaintiffs' motion to vacate the notices of examination before trial unanimously reversed, on the law and in the court's discretion, with $20 costs and disbursements to defendant-appellant-respondent and motion denied without qualification. This is not a class action. Each plaintiff sues on his or her own behalf, but for convenience, all have joined together in one action. Defendant is entitled, if it deems it necessary, to examine each plaintiff with respect to matters that are relevant and material. The factual situation, particularly with respect to the affirmative defenses, may not be the same with respect to all plaintiffs.

Concur — Breitel, J.P., Rabin, M.M. Frank, McNally and Stevens, JJ.


Summaries of

Histon v. Hearn Department Stores, Inc.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jun 23, 1959
8 A.D.2d 801 (N.Y. App. Div. 1959)
Case details for

Histon v. Hearn Department Stores, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:KATHERINE HISTON et al., Respondents-Appellants, v. HEARN DEPARTMENT…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jun 23, 1959

Citations

8 A.D.2d 801 (N.Y. App. Div. 1959)

Citing Cases

Rosado v. Valvo

Codefendants may examine each other before trial even in the absence of a cross claim ( Lombardo v. Pecora,…