From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hiser v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Beckley Division
Sep 21, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:08-cv-00941 (S.D.W. Va. Sep. 21, 2009)

Opinion

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:08-cv-00941.

September 21, 2009


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER


Plaintiff Shannon Hiser brings this action under 42 U.S.C. §§ 401- 433, 1381-1383f seeking review of the Commissioner of Social Security's final decision denying Plaintiff's application for Disability Insurance Benefits (DIB) and Supplemental Security Income (SSI) under Titles II and XVI of the Social Security Act. By Standing Order entered on August 1, 2006, and filed in this case on July 23, 2008, this action was referred to United States Magistrate Judge R. Clarke VanDervort for submission of proposed findings and a recommendation (PF R) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B). Magistrate Judge VanDervort filed his PF R on August 31, 2009 [Docket 16]. In that filing, the magistrate judge recommended that this Court deny Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [Docket 12], grant Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [Docket 15], affirm the final decision of the Commissioner, and dismiss this action from the Court's docket.

The Court is not required to review, under a de novo or any other standard, the factual or legal conclusions of the magistrate judge as to those portions of the findings or recommendation to which no objections are addressed. Thomas v. Arn, 474 U.S. 140, 150 (1985). In addition, failure to file timely objections constitutes a waiver of de novo review and Plaintiff's right to appeal this Court's Order. Snyder v. Ridenour, 889 F.2d 1363, 1366 (4th Cir. 1989); United States v. Schronce, 727 F.2d 91, 94 (4th Cir. 1984). Here, objections to Magistrate Judge VanDervort's PF R were due by September 18, 2009, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Fed.R.Civ.P. 72(b). To date, no objections have been filed.

Having reviewed the PF R [Docket 16] filed by Magistrate Judge VanDervort, the Court ADOPTS the recommendations contained therein, DENIES Plaintiff's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [Docket 12], GRANTS Defendant's Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings [Docket 15], AFFIRMS the final decision of the Commissioner, and DISMISSES this action from the Court's docket. A separate Judgment Order will enter this day implementing the rulings contained herein.

IT IS SO ORDERED.

The Court DIRECTS the Clerk to send a copy of this Order to counsel of record and any unrepresented party.


Summaries of

Hiser v. Astrue

United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Beckley Division
Sep 21, 2009
CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:08-cv-00941 (S.D.W. Va. Sep. 21, 2009)
Case details for

Hiser v. Astrue

Case Details

Full title:SHANNON M. HISER, Plaintiff, v. MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social…

Court:United States District Court, S.D. West Virginia, Beckley Division

Date published: Sep 21, 2009

Citations

CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:08-cv-00941 (S.D.W. Va. Sep. 21, 2009)

Citing Cases

McClanahan v. Colvin

"[I]t is within the administrative law judge's discretion whether to seek the assistance of a medical…