The two sources of funds were not segregated, and no amount of funds was traced to either source. See Darnell v. Darnell, No. E2018-02007-COA-R3-CV, 2019 WL 3781456, at *6 (Tenn. Ct. App. Aug. 12, 2019) (finding commingling where the wife did not prove how many times she deposited marital funds into a separate account or the amount of the deposits); Hirt v. Hirt, No. E2004-00354-COA-R3-CV, 2005 WL 292414, at *9 (Tenn. Ct. App. Feb. 8, 2005) (finding commingling where "there was absolutely no proof" showing how much of the money in an account was separate or marital); cf. Smith v. Smith, 93 S.W.3d 871, 879 (Tenn. Ct. App. 2002) (no commingling where an accountant "determine[d] the value of the accounts that was attributable to" separate property). So Husband's VA benefits lost their exempt status under the anti-attachment provision and became marital property by commingling.