Hirsh Schofield, Incorporated v. Gusmer

Full title: HIRSH SCHOFIELD, INCORPORATED, Appellant, v . AAGE GUSMER, Respondent

Court: Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: May 2, 1919

123 N.E. 869 (N.Y. 1919)

123 N.E. 869

Opinion

Argued March 19, 1919

Decided May 2, 1919

Benjamin Reass, Hugo Hirsh and Emanuel Newman for appellant.

Louis Salant for respondent.

Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.

Concur: HISCOCK, Ch. J., CHASE, COLLIN, CUDDEBACK, HOGAN, McLAUGHLIN and CRANE, JJ.