From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hirschkowitz v. Rosenkrantz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1915
169 App. Div. 957 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)

Opinion

June, 1915.


It would be difficult to conceive of a case of more unreasonable neglect on the part of the plaintiff herself and of her attorney to prosecute than appeared here. ( Meyer v. Crimmins, 135 App. Div. 911.) The plaintiff has by no means successfully explained that delay. Therefore, the order appealed from is reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion to open the default and set aside the judgment is denied, with ten dollars costs. Jenks, P.J., Carr, Stapleton, Mills and Putnam, JJ., concurred.


Summaries of

Hirschkowitz v. Rosenkrantz

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jun 1, 1915
169 App. Div. 957 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)
Case details for

Hirschkowitz v. Rosenkrantz

Case Details

Full title:Rosie Hirschkowitz, Respondent, v. Davis Rosenkrantz, Appellant

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jun 1, 1915

Citations

169 App. Div. 957 (N.Y. App. Div. 1915)
153 N.Y.S. 1120