Opinion
260
February 19, 2002.
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Elliott Wilk, J.), entered on or about December 27, 1999, which, after a nonjury trial, determined that plaintiff has a one per cent interest in the subject partnership, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
JUDD BURSTEIN, for plaintiff-appellant.
Before: Nardelli, J.P., Mazzarelli, Lerner, Buckley, JJ.
Having reviewed the evidence that formed the basis for the memorandum order, in which the trial court expressly resolved questions of credibility, we find that such evidence, fairly interpreted, permitted the trial court's conclusion as to plaintiff's ownership interest in the subject partnership (see, e.g., Haymes v. Haymes, 252 A.D.2d 438).
We have considered plaintiff's remaining arguments and find them unavailing.
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.