From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Hirsch v. Hirsch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 25, 1975
49 A.D.2d 721 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)

Opinion

September 25, 1975


Order, Supreme Court, New York County, entered January 8, 1975, granting defendant's motion to dismiss the complaint on the ground of forum non conveniens, unanimously affirmed. Respondent shall recover of appellant $60 costs and disbursements of this appeal. Considering the entire background of this litigation, including the facts that "the very acts which form the basis of [plaintiff's] claims in this action", occurred within the State of Florida, that there is a related action already pending in Florida, as well as the parties' nexus to the State of Florida, we conclude that New York is an inconvenient forum for trial of this action and that the dispute should more appropriately be litigated in the State of Florida.

Concur — Markewich, J.P., Kupferman, Murphy, Tilzer and Nunez, JJ.


Summaries of

Hirsch v. Hirsch

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Sep 25, 1975
49 A.D.2d 721 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)
Case details for

Hirsch v. Hirsch

Case Details

Full title:MOE HIRSCH, Appellant, v. FAY HIRSCH, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Sep 25, 1975

Citations

49 A.D.2d 721 (N.Y. App. Div. 1975)